Tuesday, May 7, 2019
Organisational and Stakeholder Ethical Considerations Living under a Case Study
Organisational and Stakeholder Ethical Considerations Living under a blur - Case Study ExampleEthical Organisational Culture Approach One of the approaches to analyse the case is by means of honest organisation culture. Alvesson (2002, pp. 4) states that organisational culture refers to those shared rules that guide cognitive and behavioural aspects of membership to an organisation and the avenues through which they are developed and expressed hence a system of shared symbols and meanings. Ferrell, Fraedrich and Ferrell (2010, pp. 17) state that the concept of honorable culture in an organisation means the values and norms that an organisation puts forward as appropriate tolerate to guide its employees in decision making process in determining whether their response to ethical issues is set or wrong. In this approach, the formal and informal efforts developed by an organisation to guide its operations in respect to being ethical are analysed. The organisation under study here i s Xstrata which we can bear witness that it has in the first place failed to tame its mining process emissions that stir the potential of causing lead- tipsiness to the touch community Homes, gardens and water steerings have been contaminated, and a recent study found that more than one-tenth of young children have high levels of lead in their blood (Marks 2009). ... Body, another resident, indicates that the firm has also failed to take responsibility of the poisoning claiming that the natural environment is the source. As Trevino and Nelson (2010, pp. 157) indicate it is the responsibility of the top management to guide organisations in the bearing of ethical culture, something that is largely missing in Xstrata. Instead the management strives to shun ethics hence the lie down of the firm follows suit (158). The leadership at Xstrata can be regarded as unethical since their cover-up actions and deficiency of responsibility indicate weakness in morality (161). This analysis i ndicates that the top management at Xstrata has failed to hire ethical leadership in one situation, an employee whose views on the source of lead pollution is contradictory to theirs, they let the interviewer know that the employee is presenting his personal views rather than what the firm stands for hence showing unethical leadership which is mutually goop with ethical organisational culture. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and stakeholder theories Approach Examining the CSR issues in Xstratas case is another way of analysing the case. Bueble (2009, pp. 5) is of the view that CSR refers to the strategy through which organisations achieve their commercial objectives in a manner that takes into consideration ethical values and respects individuals, communities and the environment. The stakeholder theory is a concept in CSR that maintains that organisations have responsibility and obligation towards part groups within the society (groups that may benefit or be harmed by organ isational operations) other than
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment