Dukes v. Wal-Mart Essay -- Sexism Gender Walmart Discrimination Essays

Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. is a legal battle concerning whether or not the high society engaged willfully in gender-based discrimination. Underlying causes, organizational last and ethical issues will be examined in determining how the largest private employer in the United States could have fallen prey to unfair labor practices.In 1999, women constituted 72% of Wal-Marts hourly employees, but only 33% of its managerial employees (Bhatnagar, 2004). This fact and many others are the reasons many people maintain that Wal-Mart has unfair labor practices. The Dukes v. Wal-Mart representative challenged the hiring, promotion and pay practices of Wal-Mart. The case was filed in June 2001. When the case reached class certification status it became the largest class action cultured businesss suit against employment discrimination in American history. The case equal approximately 1.6 million women that had fetched for Wal-Mart from 1998 to 2001 who felt that they had been discrim inated against because of their gender.Many women involved in the Dukes case alleged that Wal-Marts policies vary from gender to gender. The managerial staff is comprised broadly speaking of men. The relocation policy in place has a distinct regard on fe virile employees. To become a manager, one essential move multiple times at each management level. Female employees claimed that this could potentially have a disparate impact on single and get hitched with mothers, therefore the policy is not fair to all favoring the chances of a male getting a promotion over a female.According to the Berkeley Womens Law Journal (2004), Wal-Mart pays its employees about one-third less than what similarly enroll employees earn. Wal-Marts slogan is Everyday low prices, and they accomplish this by tutelage wages low and by suppressing any efforts made by unions to orchestrate Wal-Mart. In addition to paying low wages, some Wal-Mart stores allegedly desecrate the Federal Fair Labor Standards practice. The Federal Fair Labor Standards Act regulates overtime pay and child labor standards. Many employees have claimed that Wal-Mart makes them work more than 40 hours per week without overtime pay. When management realized how oft overtime pay they were logging, they would call in managers to adjust the time sheets. An subjective audit exposed the violations of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act.Many o... ...The company should employ the stakeholder theory as opposed to the agency theory. Each fragment associated with Wal-Mart will be treated fairly and honestly. In incorporating the deontology perspective as opposed to the Utilitarian viewpoint, the company will show its desire to right previous wrongs. Wal-Mart has to implement a number of changes to correct the problems it has created. Attention must be paid to ensure the employee is treated fairly. Other ways must be sought to maintain profit levels and make the stockholders happy.ReferencesBhatnagar, Ritu. (2005). Dukes v. Wal-Mart as a Catalyst for Social Activism. Retrieved July 12, 2005, from the University of Phoenix program library EBSCOhost databaseDukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc. (2004). Class Certification spatial relation Decision, United States District Court, Northern California. Retrieved July 15, 2005 from http//www.walmartclass.com/public-home.html.Featherstone, Liza. (2004). Rollback Wages Retrieved July 12, 2005, from the University of Phoenix Library EBSCOhost database.Sellers, Jeff M. (2005). Deliver us from Wal-Mart? Retrieved July 12, 2005, from the University of Phoenix Library EBSCOhost database.