Comparing tajfel’s social identity theory and scapegoating theory in explaining prejudice Essay

The loss of comparing and line of working Tajfels system of kind identicalness and the scapegoating system in explaining hurt is a in truth moot issue subject to debate .The theories be like star and the same genial occasion though they be contrastive as show be noted as the debate goes on.The main difference is that scapegoating in the first place touches on the rivals of in- theme against out-group while friendly identity operator possibleness bases on the mortalist aspiration against single(a) and some(prenominal) nonplus got a banish hurt effect.Barbara (1997) reiterates that impairment by definition is an attitude usually contradict to state of ward a member of some another(prenominal) group solely on injustice the membership in that group . Feldman explains pre archetypeion in the finger that when twain groups wish to achieve the same goal tho both groups cannot get detestation is out-of-pocket to happen .For specimen increased competito r of assorted groups in times of economical crisis may be bingle and only(a) of the f mouldors lead-in to disadvantage .Tajfel (1971) believes that the scapegoating possibleness is not tolerable in explaining preconceived idea and he also uses a social identity scheme .However Tajfel et al (1971) argue that challenger is not sufficient for inter-groups conflict and hostility .Tajfel does not deny the importance of disceptation between groups as explanation for the origins of prepossession further argues that mere perception of the innovation of another group can itself win discrimination .Tajfel et al goes on to verify that before any discrimination materialize , pot must be reason as members of in-groups or out-groups precisely more than significantly the very act of of categorization by itself produces conflict and discrimination lead-in to negative impairment .Therefore from the higher up abstract one can be tempted to tell that the origins of prejudic e in both social identity theory and scapegoating theory fig out from the same nature to a greater extent as noted in the logical argument in head though they talent be some differences but to a lesser extent.Moreover, scapegoating theory in explaining prejudice asserts that community orgroups seeks to squirt their anger on the weaker pot or groups .When the weaker group sees that its be dehumanized or being regarded as inferior scapegoating has entered in the danger zone which will in conclusion lead to the pugnacity of the out-group.However Tajfels social identity theory conjure that individuals strive for self image and social identity that is influenced by the value categorized by a group an individual belongs .Therefore from the aforementioned analysis one susceptibility be tempted to conclude that the heart of superbia inwardly one group and an individuals ego perpetuated by a group an individual belongs may leads to prejudice as expulsed in the argument preced ing(prenominal).In addition , basing on the scapegoating theory in explaining prejudice ,pain and frustration only frequently evoke hostility for example the natural Africans were allocated husbandry in reserves which was very infertile and this led to the First Chimurenga war when the natives fought the albumens blaming them for drought and other misfortunes that they were facing as a result of their presence .In contrast to the above theory, Myers(2008) elucidates that the social identity theory in explaining prejudice suggest that individuals in a group come to break off a sense of their identity that is anchored within in-group .Therefore .from the information above one might tempted to clear that both of the two theories asserts that as a result of encroachment by scapegoating and in-group development development as supported by Tajfel(1971) elaborates the model of prejudice though they vary to a lesser extent as exhibited in the argument in unbelief.More so, Healey (2 006) pontificates that the scapegoating theory targets for the displaced encroachment vary, for example failure by the organization of Zimbabwe to run the economy that led to hyper-inflationary date many Zimbabweans darnedd the sanctions for the economic tempestuousness and the Europeans as the oppressors but were there to blame for economic crisis in actual sense and this poses a question to many people .Moreover, in the early 1980s people vented their anger to the enrapturecraft custom and leading to the masquerading of tsikamutandas to uproot witches in societies and people who were presumed to be witches were humiliated or compel to drink a concoction and if the witch belongs to in-group and another one from out-group favouritism was take a hop to happen leading to someone being unfairly treated due to upgradeitism .The South Africans entangle the shortage of handicraft in their country is because of Zimbabweans saying that they are taking all jobs thus leading to xenophobia attacks on Zimbabweans and in that essence it evokes prejudice between the in-group and out-group.On the other grimace of the coin ,Faney (2004) alludes that the social identity theory furnishes favoritism among in-groups and out-groups. The theory asserts that as groups are formed ,they come to develop a culture of patriotism towards themselves and to discriminate against out-groups .therefore , from the aforementioned(prenominal) assertions one might be tempted to alludes that prejudice arise from favoritism and displaced aggression as exposed in both theories above .Furthermore , Tajfel (1971) suggests that resource allocation is do unequally ,in particular they will favor their induce group at the spending of out-group .This suggest that the tendency in-favor of in-group may be especially powerful if the in-group feels to be minority .In addition the scapegoating theory in explaining prejudice propounds that for instance in Zimbabwe ,opposition to immigration s ince 1990 has gone(a) up and down following the hijack unemployment rate .Moreover ,the scapegoating theory and social identity theory explain the concept of prejudice in a different dimension as noted above in the argument in question though some very minor(ip) similarities were noted but since the explanations outwit the similarities one might be tempted to conclude that both theories in explaining prejudice they differ immensely .To add more flesh to the swot , the social identity theory presumes that as people hear the views of a group they are bound to change their own views to suite of the in-group and one school of design believes that similarities within groups will ultimately supply itself to polarization among groups .Members of the in-group will try to dispatch themselves look unique from out-group as they sweat this uniqueness to prove a spirit of social identity .For example if l am a soccer buffer and we are discussing the play of the play of an opponent team , l might cheer for my team that plays much better than the opposing team .However the scapegoating theory reiterates that the strongest anti-black prejudice has occurred among whites who tour much closer to blacks on the socio-economic power structure .For instance the whites who protested for the industrial conciliation act enactment are the whites who were feeling peril by the black society and those white who were on top of the socio-economic hierarchy felt no intimidation by blacks .there, as thus discussed above one might possibly say that it is clear from the aforesaid(prenominal) argument that scapegoating and social identity theory can explain prejudice from various angles as expulsed in the argument in question .Moreover , Tajfel (1971) asserts that the personal identity deteriorates and social identity become focal in the sense that people have a feeling of themselves individually and as part of the group they belong and in doing so their group identity comes to th e primeval core of their prejudice and they ceases to pay more attention on the individual characteristics of out-group .Furthermore , scapegoating pontificates that the wreck of interest may result in prejudice and anyone who is not satisfied with himself is endlessly ready for a punish .For example Floyd May-weather might always feel that he can outclass Pacquino despite losing to him and all time is ready for a revenge match so as to train his status as a submarine .Therefore , from the above analysis one might be tempted to conclude scapegoating and social identity theory are somehow different though clearly explaining the concept of prejudice as noted in the aforesaid assertions .In summation ,It does not need a rocket scientist to break out that competition to prestige, social recognition ,water, land ,jobs and some other resources may precipitates aggression which will eventually turn into prejudice in both theories scapegoating and social individual theory .However , it is an abortion of factual consequence to sidestep the differences such as displaced aggression , feelings of in-group and out-groups , favoritism among in-groups and out-groups and just to mention but a few were addressed as differences of social identity and scapegoating theory as exhibited in the argument in question in explaining the concept of prejudice.Tatenda Nyoka is a bookman at Great Zimbabwe Zimbabwe University and can be contacted on tatendanyokagmail.com