Ford Case

In Ford v. Revlon Inc., the Supreme address of azimuth held that genus genus Arizonas proles honorarium law did not provide the soap remedy to Leta Fay Ford, a Revlon employee who was sexually harassed and physically assaulted by a co-worker. The court upheld the jurys verdict against Revlon, stating that the civil wrong was make through Revlons inaction over a block in excess of eight months and that the resulting delirious tarnish to the plaintiff was thitherfore not unexpected or accidental. Fords recuperation was not limited to a workers compensation claim. A a couple of(prenominal) years after the Ford decision, the Arizona Court of Appeals, in Irvin Investors Inc. v. Superior Court, was called upon to determine whether an employee could sue her employer in a tort action when she was sexually molested by a co-worker. She cited Ford as authority to bring an action against her employer. The Court of Appeals rejected her claim, stating that there was no evidence that the employer was even aware(p) of the co-workers botch until she quit.

Furthermore, the conduct was described as an unexpected injury-causing event deep down the coverage of the workers compensation statute. This case suggests a possible track toward erosion of the exclusivity blackball of workers compensation when it comes to workplace military group. If an employer is presumably on notice that an employee displays episodes of violence and does nothing, or very little, for a drawn-out period of beat and the employee ultimately engages in a violent act resulting in physical harm and emotional di stress, can the wound worker bring a claim! for intentional fuss of emotional distress against the employer? The answer appears to be a suffice yes.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper